Gemini CLI deep dive: a terminal agent worth trying
Google's Gemini CLI quietly became one of the most capable terminal agents. Here's what it does well.
Gemini CLI didn't get the launch fanfare of Claude Code or Codex CLI, and that's a shame — it's quietly become one of the most capable terminal agents available. Here is what stands out after a few weeks of daily use.
Setup and ergonomics
Install is a single command, auth uses your Google account, and the default config does the right thing on a fresh machine. No yak-shaving required.
The TUI is clean and approval prompts are clear, which matters when you're letting an agent edit files unattended.
What it does well
- Generous context window handles whole-repo summaries without choking.
- Strong at writing and updating tests against unfamiliar code.
- Reliable shell command generation — fewer fabricated flags than competitors.
- Cheap relative to the quality you get.
Where it stumbles
Multi-step refactors across many files still trail Claude Code. Output formatting occasionally drifts from your repo's conventions, and it doesn't yet have a great equivalent to CLAUDE.md for project-wide instructions.
Best fit
If you live in the terminal, work on cost-sensitive projects, or need a second opinion alongside another agent, Gemini CLI earns its place in the rotation.
Verdict
Worth installing today. Not yet a sole daily driver for complex codebases, but a strong complement and a credible primary choice for many workflows.
Comments
0 repliesJoin the conversation
Sign in to leave a comment on "Gemini CLI deep dive: a terminal agent worth trying".
Loading comments…